Age differences in risky choice: a meta-analysis
Rui Mata
Department for Cognitive and Decision Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Search for more papers by this authorAnika K. Josef
Department for Cognitive and Decision Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Search for more papers by this authorGregory R. Samanez-Larkin
Psychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
Search for more papers by this authorRalph Hertwig
Department for Cognitive and Decision Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Search for more papers by this authorRui Mata
Department for Cognitive and Decision Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Search for more papers by this authorAnika K. Josef
Department for Cognitive and Decision Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Search for more papers by this authorGregory R. Samanez-Larkin
Psychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
Search for more papers by this authorRalph Hertwig
Department for Cognitive and Decision Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Does risk taking change as a function of age? We conducted a systematic literature search and found 29 comparisons between younger and older adults on behavioral tasks thought to measure risk taking (N= 4,093). The reports relied on various tasks differing in several respects, such as the amount of learning required or the choice framing (gains vs. losses). The results suggest that age-related differences vary considerably as a function of task characteristics, in particular the learning requirements of the task. In decisions from experience, age-related differences in risk taking were a function of decreased learning performance: older adults were more risk seeking compared to younger adults when learning led to risk-avoidant behavior, but were more risk averse when learning led to risk-seeking behavior. In decisions from description, younger adults and older adults showed similar risk-taking behavior for the majority of the tasks, and there were no clear age-related differences as a function of gain/loss framing. We discuss limitations and strengths of past research and provide suggestions for future work on age-related differences in risk taking.
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
NYAS_6200_sm_SuppMat.pdf462.4 KB | Supporting info item |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- 1 Vaupel, J.W. 2010. Biodemography of human ageing. Nature 464: 536–542.
- 2 The Economist. May 12, 2011. The new tech bubble. The Economist Newspaper Limited.
- 3 Peters, E. et al . 2007. Adult age differences in dual information processes: implications for the role of affective and deliberative processes in older adults’ decision making. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2: 1–23.
- 4 Mohr, P.N., S.-C. Li & H.R. Heekeren. 2010. Neuroeconomics and aging: neuromodulation of economic decision making in old age. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34: 678–688.
- 5 Hanoch, Y., S. Wood & T. Rice. 2007. Bounded rationality, emotions and older adult decision making: not so fast and yet so frugal. Hum. Dev. 50: 333–358.
- 6 Weber, E.U. 2010. Risk attitude and preference. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Cogn. Sci. 1: 79–88.
- 7 Knight, F.H. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profits. University of Chicago Press. Chicago .
- 8 Hertwig, R. et al . 2004. Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychol. Sci. 15: 534–539.
- 9 Hau, R. et al . 2008. The description-experience gap in risky choice: the role of sample size and experienced probabilities. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 21: 493–518.
- 10 Hills, T.T. & R. Hertwig. 2010. Information search in decisions from experience: do our patterns of sampling foreshadow our decisions? Psychol. Sci. 21: 1787–1792.
- 11 Hertwig, R. & I. Erev. 2009. The description-experience gap in risky choice. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13: 517–523.
- 12 Appelt, K.C. et al . 2011. The Decision Making Individual Differences Inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research. Judgment Decis. Mak. 6: 252–262.
- 13 Schonberg, T., C.R. Fox & R.A. Poldrack. 2011. Mind the gap: bridging economic and naturalistic risk-taking with cognitive neuroscience. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15: 11–19.
- 14
Rogers, R.D.
et al
. 1999. Choosing between small, likely rewards and large, unlikely rewards activates inferior and orbital prefrontal cortex.
J. Neurosci.
20: 9029–9038.
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-20-09029.1999 Google Scholar
- 15 Mikels, J.A. & A.E. Reed. 2009. Monetary losses do not loom large in later life: age differences in the framing effect. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 64: 457–460.
- 16 Dror, I.E., M. Katona & K. Mungur. 1998. Age differences in decision making: to take a risk or not? Gerontology 44: 67–71.
- 17 Weller, J.A., I.P. Levin & N.L. Denburg. 2010. Trajectory of risky decision making for potential gains and losses from ages 5 to 85. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. In Press.
- 18 Bechara, A. et al . 1994. Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition 50: 7–15.
- 19 Lejuez, C.W. et al . 2001. Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). J. Exp. Psychol. 8: 75–84.
- 20 Daly, M. & M. Wilson. 1997. Crime and conflict: homicide in evolutionary psychological perspective. Crime Justice 22: 51–100.
- 21 Low, B.S. 2000. Why Sex Matters: A Darwinian Look at Human Behavior. Princeton University Press. Princeton , NJ .
- 22 Rogers, A.R. 1994. Evolution of time preference by natural-selection. Am. Econ. Rev. 84: 460–481.
- 23 Bäckman, L. et al . 2000. Age-related cognitive deficits mediated by changes in the striatal dopamine system. Am. J. Psychiatry 157: 635–637.
- 24 Volkow, N.D. et al . 1998. Association between decline in brain dopamine activity with age and cognitive and motor impairment in healthy individuals. Am. J. Psychiatry 155: 344–349.
- 25 Mata, R. & L. Nunes. 2010. When less is enough: cognitive aging, information search, and decision quality in consumer choice. Psychol. Aging 25: 289–298.
- 26 Mata, R., L.J. Schooler & J. Rieskamp. 2007. The aging decision maker: cognitive aging and the adaptive selection of decision strategies. Psychol. Aging 22: 796–810.
- 27 Mata, R., B. von Helversen & J. Rieskamp. 2010. Learning to choose: cognitive aging and strategy selection learning in decision making. Psychol. Aging 25: 299–309.
- 28 Bruine de Bruin, W., A.M. Parker & B. Fischhoff. 2010. Explaining adult age differences in decision making competence. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 24: 1–14.
- 29 Bruine de Bruin, W., A.M. Parker & B. Fischoff. 2007. Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 92: 938–956.
- 30 Chasseigne, G. et al . 2004. Aging and probabilistic learning in single- and multiple-cue tasks. Exp. Aging Res. 30: 23–45.
- 31 Mell, T. et al . 2009. Altered function of ventral striatum during reward-based decision making in old age. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 3: 1–10.
- 32 Samanez-Larkin, G.R. et al . 2010. Variability in nucleus accumbens activity mediates age-related suboptimal financial risk taking. J. Neurosci. 30: 1426–1434.
- 33 Hosseini, S.M.H. et al . 2010. Aging and decision making under uncertainty: behavioral and neural evidence for the preservation of decision making in the absence of learning in old age. Neuro Image 52: 1514–1520.
- 34 Blanchard-Fields, F. 2007. Everyday problem solving and emotion: an adult developmental perspective. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16: 26–31.
- 35 Carstensen, L.L. 2006. The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science 312: 1913–1915.
- 36 Lerner, J.S. & D. Keltner. 2001. Fear, anger, and risk. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81: 146–159.
- 37 Scholer, A.A. et al . 2010. When risk seeking becomes a motivational necessity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 99: 215–231.
- 38 Mather, M. & L.L. Carstensen. 2005. Aging and motivated cognition: the positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9: 496–502.
- 39 Samanez-Larkin, G.R. et al . 2007. Anticipation of monetary gain but not loss in healthy older adults. Nature Neurosci. 10: 787–791.
- 40 Ebner, N.C., A.M. Freund & P.B. Baltes. 2006. Developmental changes in personal goal orientation from young to late adulthood: from striving forgains to maintenance and prevention of losses. Psychol. Aging 21: 664–678.
- 41 Borenstein, M. & L.V. Hedges. 2009. Introduction to Meta-Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Chichester, West Sussex .
- 42 Ashman, O. et al . 2003. Preserved risk-taking skills in old age. North Am. J. Psychol. 5: 397–407.
- 43 Baena, E. et al . 2010. On age differences in prefrontal function: the importance of emotional/cognitive integration. Neuropsychologia 48: 319–333.
- 44 Deakin, J. et al . 2004. Risk taking during decision-making in normal volunteers changes with age. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 10: 590–598.
- 45 Denburg, N., D. Tranel & A. Bechara. 2005. The ability to decideadvantageously declines prematurely in some normal older persons. Neuropsychologia 43: 1099–1106.
- 46 Denburg, N. et al . 2009. Poor decision making among older adults is related to elevated levels of neuroticism. Ann. Behav. Med. 37: 64–172.
- 47 Fein, G., S. McGillivray & P. Finn. 2007. Older adults make less advantageous decisions than younger adults: cognitive and psychological correlates. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 13: 480–489.
- 48 Henninger, D.E., D.J. Madden & S.A. Huettel. 2010. Processing speed and memory mediate age-related differences in decision making. Psychol. Aging 25: 262–270.
- 49 Holliday, S.G. 1988. Risky-choice behavior: a life-span analysis. Int. J. Aging Hum. Dev. 27: 25–33.
- 50 Isella, V. et al . 2008. Age-related quantitative and qualitative changes in decision making ability. Behav. Neurol. 19: 59–63.
- 51
Kim, S.
et al
. 2005. Framing effects in younger and older adults.
J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.
4: 215–218.
10.1093/geronb/60.4.P215 Google Scholar
- 52 Lamar, M. & S.M. Resnick. 2004. Aging and prefrontal functions: dissociating orbitofrontal and dorsolateral abilities. Neurobiol. Aging 25: 553–558.
- 53 Lauriola, M. & I.P. Levin. 2001. Personality traits and risky decision-making in a controlled task: an Exploratory study. Pers. Individ. Differ. 31: 215–226.
- 54 Lee, T.M.C. et al . 2008. Age-related differences in neutral activities during risk taking revealed by functional MRI. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 3: 7–15.
- 55 MacPherson, S.E., L.H. Phillips & S. Della Sala. 2001. Age, executive function and social decision making: a dorsolateral prefrontal theory of cognitive aging. Psychol. Aging 17: 598–609.
- 56 Mayhorn, C.B., A.D. Fisk & J.D. Whittle. 2002. Decisions, decisions: analysis of age, cohort, and time of testing on framing of risky decision options. Hum. Factors 44: 515–521.
- 57 Rafaely, V., I.E. Dror & B. Remington. 2006. Information selectivity in decision making by younger and older adults. Int. J. Psychol. 41: 117–131.
- 58 Rolison, J.J., Y. Hanoch & S. Wood. 2011. Risky decision making in younger and older adults: the role of learning. Psychol. Aging. Jul 18. [Epub ahead of print].
- 59 Rönnlund, M. et al . 2005. Risky decision making across three arenas of choice: are younger and older adults differently susceptible to framing effects? J. Gen. Psychol. 132: 81–92.
- 60 Samanez-Larkin, G.R., A.D. Wagner & B. Knutson. 2011. Expected value information improves financial risk taking across the adult life span. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 6: 207–217.
- 61 Sproten, A. et al . 2010. Aging and Decision Making: How Aging Affects Decisions Under Uncertainty. Working Papers University of Heidelberg .
- 62 Watabene, S. & H. Shibutani. 2010. Aging and decision making: differences in susceptibility to the risky-choice framing effect between older and younger adults in Japan. Japan. Psychol. Res. 52: 163–174.
- 63 Wood, S. et al . 2005. Older adults as adaptive decision makers: evidence from the Iowa Gambling Task. Psychol. Aging 20: 220–225.
- 64 Zamarian, L. et al . 2008. Normal aging affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk. Neuropsychology 22: 645–657.
- 65 Kovalchik, S. & J. Allman. 2006. Measuring reversal learning: introducing the Variable Iowa Gambling Task in a study of young and old normals. Cogn. Emotion 20: 714–728.
- 66 Brandstätter, E., G. Gigerenzer & R. Hertwig. 2006. The priority heuristic: making choices without trade-offs. Psychol. Rev. 113: 409–432.
- 67 Malmendier, U. & S. Nagel. 2011. Depression babies: do macroeconomic experiences affect risk taking? Quart. J. Econ. 126: 373–416.
- 68 Tversky, A. & D. Kahneman. 1992. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5: 297–323.
- 69
Agarwal, S.
et al
. 2009. The age of reason: financial decisions over the life cycle and implications for regulation.
Brookings Pap. Econ. Act.
42: 51–117.
10.1353/eca.0.0067 Google Scholar
- 70 Hertwig, R. & A. Ortmann. 2001. Experimental practices in economics: a methodological challenge for psychologists? Behav. Brain Sci. 24: 383–451.
- 71 Eppinger, B., D. Hämmerer & S-C. Li. 2011. Neuromodulation of reward-based learning and decision making in human aging. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1235: 1–17. This volume.