Volume 1001, Issue 1 p. 226-239

The Seven Sins of Memory

Implications for Self

DANIEL L. SCHACTER

Corresponding Author

DANIEL L. SCHACTER

Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA

Address for correspondence: Daniel L. Schacter, Department of Psychology, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland St., Cambridge, MA 02138. Voice: 617-495-3855; fax: 617-496-3122. [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
JOAN Y. CHIAO

JOAN Y. CHIAO

Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA

Search for more papers by this author
JASON P. MITCHELL

JASON P. MITCHELL

Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 January 2006
Citations: 55

Abstract

Abstract: We examine the relation between memory and self by considering errors of memory. We draw on the idea that memory's imperfections can be classified into seven basic categories or “sins.” Three of the sins concern different types of forgetting (transience, absent-mindedness, and blocking), three concern different types of distortion (misattribution, suggestibility, and bias), and one concerns intrusive memories (persistence). We focus in particular on two of the distortion-related sins, misattribution and bias. By describing cognitive, neuropsychological, and neuroimaging studies that illuminate these memory sins, we consider how they might bear on the relation between memory and self.